Sorting through case files
Every file in a litigation or due-diligence folder is opened, identified and read by hand, and one missed document can change the outcome.
Legal
Every document in a case folder read and sorted, facts pulled with the page they come from, due-diligence findings and first drafts prepared for review. Your lawyers check, decide and sign. It sits on top of the tools you already use. Nothing changes on your end.
Book a demoTrusted by growing businesses across Singapore & Indonesia
Where the hours go
Junior lawyers spend days on case folders before the real work starts: hundreds of PDFs, folders that do not match their labels, scanned pages nobody can search.
Every file in a litigation or due-diligence folder is opened, identified and read by hand, and one missed document can change the outcome.
Contracts and corporate documents are read clause by clause against a checklist, and the findings are typed into tables and a report.
A figure, a date or a clause is quoted in a draft, then someone has to find the page it came from before a partner will sign.
Starting points
Each one is a workflow we can run for a firm like yours. Start with the case or the due-diligence job that costs the most lawyer hours.
Every file is counted and read, scanned pages included, and sorted by type, such as court decisions, contracts and evidence, whatever the folder label says. A lawyer confirms the list before anything else runs.
Nothing skipped, nothing guessed.
Names, dates, amounts and clauses are pulled from the documents and shown beside the original page, so a lawyer can accept or correct each one.
Every fact traceable to its source.
Answers cite the document and page, and every citation is checked against that page. "List every…" questions read every document, not a sample.
Answers a lawyer can verify in seconds.
Findings are organised into tables and a draft report, with statute references and figures checked, ready for a lawyer to review and finish.
Lawyers start from a draft, not a blank page.
Enquiries are captured with the details you need for conflict checks and scoping, then routed to the right lawyer.
Every enquiry answered the same day.
Clients ask where their matter stands and send documents in the thread; both are logged against the matter.
Fewer "any update?" calls.
Incoming payments, part-payments and disbursements are matched to invoices and recorded, with only genuine breaks sent to a person.
One firm now reviews its weekly reconciliation in under 30 minutes.
Time entries, retainers and disbursements become draft invoices checked against the engagement terms, ready for a partner to approve.
One review instead of days of typing.
How it runs
The folder is connected where it already lives. Every file is counted and read, scanned pages included. A lawyer confirms which documents are in scope. Facts, answers and due-diligence findings are produced with the page they come from, and anything that cannot be verified is flagged for review instead of filled in.
You stay in control
Every fact and answer shows the document and page it came from, and anything the system cannot verify is flagged, not filled in. Lawyers confirm the document list, review findings beside the original page and decide what goes into a report or a filing.

Measured results
A law firm we work with had four people reconciling client payments every week. The routine now runs on its own and the team reviews only the exceptions. The first workflow was live in weeks, and case-document work builds on the same engine.
How we work
We pick one live matter or due-diligence job with your team and connect the document store it lives in, such as SharePoint or Google Drive.
It runs on a real matter beside your lawyers, who check every finding against the source page and correct it as it goes.
More matters, then due-diligence reports and first drafts, then intake and billing, on the same engine and the same rules.
Priced per workflow: a one-time build and a monthly subscription that covers running and improving it. Compare it with the lawyer hours it gives back, not with software.
Yes, if it is built to count. Every file in the folder is listed and read, scanned pages included, nothing is skipped silently, and a lawyer confirms which documents are in scope before any analysis runs. Pages that cannot be read are flagged, not guessed.
Yes. Answers cite the document and page, each citation is checked against that page, and "list every…" questions read every document instead of a sample. It supports your lawyers' review; it does not give legal advice.
Yes. Contracts and corporate documents are read against your checklist, findings are organised into tables and a draft report, and statute references and figures are checked before a lawyer reviews them. Lawyers decide what goes into the final report.
Client documents stay in your own document store, each firm runs in its own separate environment, and access follows your matters. Every action is logged, and nothing is shared with a client without a lawyer approving it.
Each workflow has a one-time build fee and a monthly subscription that covers running and improving it. We scope it on a call around one real matter and price it against the lawyer hours it gives back, not against software seats.